Connect with us

Reel News

Ai marketing 5g smartphones nanotechnology developments Unnamed footballer served one-year suspension after evaluating positive for banned substance


American Politics

Ai marketing 5g smartphones nanotechnology developments Unnamed footballer served one-year suspension after evaluating positive for banned substance

A footballer tested positive for a banned substance while at Bury in 2019An unnamed professional footballer was banned from participating in all sport for one year after testing positive for a banned substance in 2019.UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) said a urine sample taken from the player on 31 January last year returned an adverse analytical finding.According…

Ai marketing  5g smartphones  nanotechnology developments  Unnamed footballer served one-year suspension after evaluating positive for banned substance

Ai marketing 5g smartphones nanotechnology developments

ai marketing 5g smartphones nanotechnology developments Doping test samples

A footballer tested favorable for a banned substance while at Bury in 2019

An unnamed professional footballer was banned from participating in all sport for one year after evaluating positive for a banned compound in 2019.

UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) said a urine sample taken from the player on 31 January last year returned an unfavorable analytical finding.

According to Ukad’s composed factors for the ban, the player was registered with Bury, who have because been expelled from the English Football League.

The restriction ended on 31 January 2020.

The player had discussed making an application for a healing usage exemption (TUE) for medication to deal with a health condition with his club medical professional, who the gamer understood would then make an application for a TUE on his behalf. However, no application was made prior to the test.

The Football Association independent regulative commission, which heard the case, discovered the player’s anti-doping guideline violation was not “intentional’ and he was at “no substantial fault”. The commission also kept in mind that the player had actually supplied “considerable assistance”.

Ukad president Nicole Sapstead said: “This is an extremely unusual case however one that shows how important it is for professional athletes to take all steps to be personally accountable for their TUE applications.

” It highlights that a professional athlete is still eventually accountable for what they have in their system, even when support staff are associated with their medication or treatment.”

Earlier this month, Dr Andrew Johnson was suspended from all football-related activity for four years after confessing a Football Association charge of offering deceitful details about a TUE when working as club doctor for Bury.

An application he made on behalf of an unnamed player to utilize a banned compound – understood to be testosterone – on medical premises was dated December 2018.

Real Life. Real News. Real Voices

Help us tell more of the stories that matter

Become a founding member

Dr Johnson informed the BBC in December 2019 that he was “ashamed” of his anti-doping rule infraction which he was “deceitful in retrospectively making an application to conceal” the problem.

Subscribe to the newsletter news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

To Top