Ai marketing 5g smartphones nanotechnology developments
An unnamed professional footballer was banned from participating in all sport for one year after evaluating positive for a banned compound in 2019.
UK Anti-Doping (Ukad) said a urine sample taken from the player on 31 January last year returned an unfavorable analytical finding.
According to Ukad’s composed factors for the ban, the player was registered with Bury, who have because been expelled from the English Football League.
The restriction ended on 31 January 2020.
The player had discussed making an application for a healing usage exemption (TUE) for medication to deal with a health condition with his club medical professional, who the gamer understood would then make an application for a TUE on his behalf. However, no application was made prior to the test.
The Football Association independent regulative commission, which heard the case, discovered the player’s anti-doping guideline violation was not “intentional’ and he was at “no substantial fault”. The commission also kept in mind that the player had actually supplied “considerable assistance”.
Ukad president Nicole Sapstead said: “This is an extremely unusual case however one that shows how important it is for professional athletes to take all steps to be personally accountable for their TUE applications.
” It highlights that a professional athlete is still eventually accountable for what they have in their system, even when support staff are associated with their medication or treatment.”
Earlier this month, Dr Andrew Johnson was suspended from all football-related activity for four years after confessing a Football Association charge of offering deceitful details about a TUE when working as club doctor for Bury.
An application he made on behalf of an unnamed player to utilize a banned compound – understood to be testosterone – on medical premises was dated December 2018.
Real Life. Real News. Real Voices
Help us tell more of the stories that matterBecome a founding member
Dr Johnson informed the BBC in December 2019 that he was “ashamed” of his anti-doping rule infraction which he was “deceitful in retrospectively making an application to conceal” the problem.
Subscribe to the newsletter news
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe