Connect with us

Reel News

Bill would restrict access to judges’ personal information


Thoughts and Opinions

Bill would restrict access to judges’ personal information

NEWARK, N.J. (AP) — In the wake of the fatal shooting of a federal judge’s son in New Jersey, bi-partisan legislation seeks to restrict online access to judges’ personal information. Twenty-year-old Daniel Anderl, the son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, was shot and killed inside the family’s home on July 19 by a gunman…

Bill would restrict access to judges’ personal information

NEWARK, N.J. (AP)– In the wake of the fatal shooting of a federal judge’s kid in New Jersey, bi-partisan legislation looks for to limit online access to judges’ personal info.

Twenty-year-old Daniel Anderl, the son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas, was shot and killed inside the family’s home on July 19 by a shooter impersonating a shipment driver. Salas’ hubby, Mark Anderl, was seriously wounded and is recuperating. Salas remained in another part of your home and wasn’t hurt.

The enemy, Roy Den Hollander, was an unhappy lawyer who had actually posted anti-feminist screeds and who had a file with details about a dozen female judges around the country. He was included in a gender bias case prior to Salas, in which he challenged the U.S. armed force’s male-only draft registration requirement.

Den Hollander eliminated himself in upstate New york city shortly after shooting Anderl.

Democratic New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez, who suggested Salas for bench throughout the Obama administration, announced the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Personal Privacy Act Upon Monday. He was signed up with by fellow Democratic New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, who serves on the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Democratic New Jersey Rep. Mikie Sherrill, who appeared in court prior to Salas throughout her years as a federal district attorney.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, chair of the judiciary committee, is co-sponsoring the bill, Menendez stated.

Real Life. Real News. Real Voices

Help us tell more of the stories that matter

Become a founding member

The costs would make it illegal for online aggregators to sell or reveal individual information about judges and their households, including home addresses, social security numbers and school and employment information. It also would give federal marshals more resources to assess and track hazards against judges.

” We may not have the ability to remove hatred from somebody’s heart, however what we can do is ensure that males and females who serve on the federal bench do not make such simple targets,” Menendez said.

Salas, in a video posted on YouTube two weeks after the shooting, called it “unacceptable” that individual info is so easily available.

Menendez said he thought the legislation wouldn’t infringe on totally free speech rights.

” You can still write anything you desire about a judge’s choice,” he said. “You can still say anything you want about their rulings, but you need not have their personal identifying details for you to preserve your First Amendment right to do so.”

Subscribe to the newsletter news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

To Top